Boot and onboarding workflow
DHCP options, boot images and platform-native ZTP or POAP flows, with device identity tied to its source-of-truth record from first contact.
Bare metal to production without an engineer on a console — day-0 configuration rendered from the source of truth, then verified before anyone calls it done.
Manual provisioning is slow, but the real cost is variance. Two engineers build the same site a week apart and produce two subtly different networks, and the difference surfaces eighteen months later during an outage.
Zero-touch provisioning removes the variance by making the source of truth the only input. A device boots, identifies itself, pulls the configuration its record says it should have, and reports back.
The step most implementations skip is verification. A device that came up is not the same as a device that came up correctly, and post-deploy validation is what closes that gap.
DHCP options, boot images and platform-native ZTP or POAP flows, with device identity tied to its source-of-truth record from first contact.
Rendered from the same templates and the same data your day-2 changes use. One path, so provisioning and operations cannot drift apart.
Carrier circuit turn-up, addressing and service configuration handled as part of the same workflow rather than a separate ticket queue.
Automated checks that interfaces, routing adjacencies, reachability and policy match intent, with a pass or fail result recorded against the device.
Bringing existing devices into the same lifecycle, so you are not running two operating models indefinitely.
Documented, rehearsed procedures your team owns — including what to do when the automated path fails and remote hands are all you have.
Provisioning is where the agent earns trust cheaply, because the correct answer is already written down.
The agent compares what the device reports against its source-of-truth record and flags the mismatch before the site carries traffic.
When a device does not come up clean, the agent has the boot logs, the rendered config and the intended state side by side.
Devices provisioned identically drift apart over months. Continuous comparison against intent surfaces it as a report, not an outage.
Yes, though the boot mechanism differs — ZTP, POAP and vendor equivalents all solve the same problem in slightly different ways. The workflow above the boot layer, where configuration is rendered and validated, stays common across platforms.
Usually yes, because the value is not limited to new sites. The same templates and validation logic apply to refreshes, RMA replacements and hardware upgrades, which for most enterprises is a larger volume than greenfield.
It fails visibly, with the boot logs, rendered configuration and intended state captured together, and it falls back to a documented manual procedure. A silent partial success is far more dangerous than a clean failure.
In the engagements we have run, multi-day site turn-ups typically come down to under a day, with the remaining time spent on physical work and carrier dependencies rather than configuration. We will walk you through the specific arithmetic for your environment during the consult.
In 30 minutes, we’ll evaluate your infrastructure maturity, identify operational risk areas, and highlight high-impact automation opportunities.
No scripts. No invasive discovery. Just clarity.