Runbook codification
Turning the procedures your engineers already follow into tested, versioned actions. The knowledge stops living only in the heads of three people.
Codified runbooks the agent can execute against conditions it recognises — bounded by approval gates, blast-radius policy and an audit trail that survives a post-incident review.
A large share of network incidents have a known cause and a known fix. Someone wakes up, reads a familiar alert, runs a familiar procedure, and goes back to bed. That work is real, repetitive and almost entirely mechanical.
Auto-remediation moves that class of work to the agent. Not the novel faults, not the ones requiring judgement about business risk — the ones with a runbook that already exists.
The reason teams hesitate is control, and they are right to. So control is the design centre here: what the agent may touch, under what conditions, with whose approval, and what it records while doing it.
Turning the procedures your engineers already follow into tested, versioned actions. The knowledge stops living only in the heads of three people.
An explicit ladder: observe only, propose, approve-then-act, act-and-report. Each action starts low and moves up when the evidence supports it.
Hard limits on scope — how many devices, which roles, which sites, what time windows — enforced before an action runs, not reviewed afterwards.
Approval where your team already works, with the evidence, the proposed change and the rollback plan in one place.
Every action is followed by a check that it worked. If the signal does not recover, the agent rolls back and escalates rather than trying again.
A complete record of what the agent saw, concluded, proposed, did and verified — exportable for compliance and readable in a post-incident review.
This is the agent acting rather than advising. It is also the capability we deliberately enable last.
Remediation only fires when the diagnosis matches a codified runbook with sufficient confidence. Novel faults go to a human, clearly labelled as novel.
The action runs through the same pipeline your engineers use, subject to the same validation, capped by blast-radius policy.
Post-action verification against the original signal. Recovery is reported; failure triggers rollback and escalation.
Not unless you explicitly configure it to, for a specific action, after that action has proven itself in propose-only mode. Approval-gated is the default and most clients keep the majority of actions there permanently.
Three safeguards apply. Blast-radius policy caps the damage any single action can do. Post-action verification detects that the signal did not recover. Automatic rollback returns the previous state and escalates to a human with the full trace attached.
With high-frequency, low-risk, well-understood conditions — interface resets, clearing a stuck process, restoring a known-good configuration block. These build the operational trust that later justifies wider scope.
Traditional runbook automation fires on a trigger and follows a fixed script. The agent diagnoses first, across correlated signals, and only then selects a runbook — so it does not run the interface-reset procedure on a fault that is actually an upstream MTU mismatch.
In 30 minutes, we’ll evaluate your infrastructure maturity, identify operational risk areas, and highlight high-impact automation opportunities.
No scripts. No invasive discovery. Just clarity.